G2 vs. MIBR @ IEM Chicago 2019
MIBR |
K-D | KD Diff | A (f) | HS% | EK | ED | KAST | Trades | Traded | Clutches | ADR | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
46-26 | 20 | 10 (10) | 32.6% | 5 | 3 | 88.0% | 14 | 7 | 1 | 91.8 |
1.51
|
|
|
41-36 | 5 | 12 (5) | 39.0% | 10 | 4 | 82.5% | 7 | 10 | 0 | 100.2 | 1.47 |
|
|
41-29 | 12 | 9 (0) | 48.8% | 9 | 3 | 81.2% | 4 | 7 | 0 | 83.5 | 1.27 |
|
|
36-28 | 8 | 3 (0) | 50.0% | 10 | 2 | 79.0% | 6 | 7 | 1 | 78.3 | 1.16 |
|
|
26-28 | -2 | 13 (6) | 65.4% | 2 | 1 | 79.8% | 6 | 10 | 1 | 58.6 | 0.96 |
G2 |
K-D | KD Diff | A (f) | HS% | EK | ED | KAST | Trades | Traded | Clutches | ADR | PPR |
|
|
39-39 | 0 | 7 (0) | 59.0% | 4 | 9 | 68.9% | 11 | 9 | 1 | 82.0 | 1.09 |
|
|
33-33 | 0 | 10 (1) | 51.5% | 2 | 5 | 70.1% | 10 | 5 | 0 | 76.2 | 1.02 |
|
|
34-38 | -4 | 10 (4) | 47.1% | 3 | 5 | 77.5% | 12 | 11 | 2 | 64.3 | 0.97 |
|
|
28-40 | -12 | 4 (4) | 46.4% | 4 | 5 | 62.3% | 3 | 9 | 1 | 64.3 | 0.82 |
|
|
13-40 | -27 | 9 (7) | 30.8% | 0 | 12 | 47.2% | 5 | 9 | 0 | 43.5 | 0.48 |





MIBR
G2